Menu
![]() Thunderbolt IS external PCIe and MC explained already that it does not need so high buffersizes for this reason. The objective is really not to compare or to kind of "rate" USB and Thunderbolt technology by its max buffersize. You are mixing causalities and priorities somehow. Is there any chance in the future that 8192 could be added to thunderbolt at 44.1K ? So there is a slight advantage to using thunderbolt and that is you can have a higher buffer on a lower project sample rate. ![]() However at 44.1K using USB 3.0 the maximum asio panel is 2096 buffer size. Tried USB 3.0 and with 192k the 8192 appears.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |